Commodities weekly: As chaos reigns, what’s next for markets?

By Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo

  • Battered and bruised by Trump's tariff rollercoaster ride, the market saw a fragile state of calm emerge after Washington buckled and announced a 90-day tariff pause to calm an increasingly disorderly US government bond market.
  • The tariff delay eased recession fears, allowing the Bloomberg Commodities Index to trade higher on the week, partly reversing the biggest four-day slump since 2022, with gains being led by silver, gold, corn, and soybeans.
  • Gold hit all-time highs as underlying concerns remain, while silver's brutal slump has helped attract fresh demand.
  • Copper traders bet on China stimulus, with crude oil stabilising after tumbling towards supply destruction territory.

Battered and bruised by Trump's tariff rollercoaster ride, a fragile state of calm emerged after Washington buckled and announced a 90-day tariff pause on all reciprocal tariffs ex-China. Prior to this, markets had seen a justified meltdown as they tried to absorb the blow of Trump's far larger-than-expected tariffs on all its major counterparts, sparking threats of retaliation and a broad selloff around the world on concerns that a global trade war on this scale and magnitude will drive an economic slowdown—not least in the US, where inflation forecasts have spiked, and sentiment among consumers and businesses has fallen sharply during the past couple of months.

The relief rally that followed the tariff delay announcement also supported the commodities sector, with the Bloomberg Commodities Index managing a rebound, partly reversing the biggest four-day slump since 2022. Despite of this, the overall post-Liberation Day sell off has been brutal across some of the sectors, not least across a pro-cyclical sectors like energy. As the dust settles, it's clear that the global economic outlook remains fragile, and even after removing the highly controversial reciprocal tariffs, US consumers are still facing the biggest tax rise through tariffs in more than 100 years, while major exporters of goods contemplates the economic fallout. Next up, traders will be looking for a Chinese response, with additional stimulus measures potentially adding some support to industrial metals.

What caused Trump to buckle?

It was also a week when many realised the real danger was not the slump seen across global stock markets, but instead an increasingly disorderly behaviour in the US government bond market, normally considered one of the safest investments, which should benefit during times of turmoil. Instead, we saw a disorderly spike in long-end US Treasury yields, while global equity markets continued to fall, basically leaving investors with no safe options besides ultra-short-term bonds in anticipation of further rate cuts, gold, and a few currencies, most notably EUR, CHF, and JPY.

A four-day 65 basis point jump in 10-year US Treasury notes briefly took the yield above 4.5%, and while the actual rate was not the focus, it was the pace with which bonds tumbled that made everyone take note, raising speculation the move was driven by foreign selling pressure, focusing on China and Japan and partly due to:

  • Rising need to repatriate dollars to meet import and debt obligations.
  • Concerns over USD's role as a reserve currency in a fragmented world.
  • Retaliation to the tariffs imposed by the US administration.
  • Foreigners still hold 33% of USD-denominated debt, so any unwind matters.

Whoever was selling, the message was clear: the selloff in risk assets pressured the White House into softening its tariff posture, at least temporarily. And it also highlights just how reactive current policy has become—and reinforces the need for everyone to stay nimble in the face of unpredictable decision-making.

Tariff pause drives temporary rebound, while gold shines bright

Commodity markets surged following Trump's tariff delay, easing fears of a global recession hurting demand. Leading the gains were the metals both precious and industrial, while crude oil rebounded nearly eight dollars from a four-year low before reversing lower again on the realisation the global economic outlook remains challenged at a time when OPEC+ is accelerating its planned production increase. Gold's very strong recovery back to a fresh all-time high, meanwhile, sent a signal that all is not well, and its continued strength suggests that despite the tariff pause, underlying concerns remain—geopolitical and economic tensions, mounting fiscal debt, and ongoing central bank demand.

With markets held hostage by the White House's erratic announcements, it's still too early to call a bottom for pro-cyclical commodities in the energy and industrial metals sectors. However, the tariff pause offers traders a moment to reassess the outlook while trying to determine how much has already been priced in.

The Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF is one of several exchange-traded funds that replicates the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index, an index which tracks the performance of 24 major commodity futures shared almost equally between energy, metals, and agriculture, with the largest holdings being Brent & WTI crude oil (15%), US natural gas (7.8%), gold (14.3%), copper (5.4%), and the soybean complex (15.1%). The index trades up 3% year-to-date and despite a +5% drubbing this month remains one of the best-performing asset classes, not least due to strong performances in gold, natural gas, copper, and coffee.

Gold’s deleveraging pullback spurs fresh demand

Spot gold's initial response to the steepest US trade barriers in more than 100 years was a move to a fresh record high of USD 3,167 per troy ounce on heightened inflation risks, before surging volatility in response to collapsing stock markets saw traders turn their attention to capital preservation and deleveraging—the dash-for-cash focus hurt all leveraged positions across the commodities sector, including those in silver, which experienced a brutal 16.5% top-to-bottom slump, but also bullion, which despite its safe haven label during times of turmoil fell by around 4% before finding solid support around USD 2,950.

As the dust begins to settle following one of the worst risk reduction periods in recent years, demand for silver and especially gold has re-emerged, with gold has reaching a fresh all-time-high above USD 3,200, while silver has managed to retrace half of what was lost during the first week of April, both strongly suggesting that underlying concerns remain.

A combination of heightened global economic tensions, the risk of stagflation – a combination of lower employment, growth and rising inflation - a weaker dollar, will, in our opinion, continue to support bullion, and to a certain extent also silver. Adding to this is a market that is now aggressively positioning for the Fed to deliver more cuts this year—at current count more than 75 basis points of easing by year-end, and not least continued demand from central banks and high net worth individuals looking to reduce or hedge their exposure to US government bonds and the dollar.

With all the mentioned developments in mind, we maintain our forecast for gold reaching a minimum of USD 3,300 this year, while silver, given its industrious exposure and recession worries, may struggle to materially outperform gold as we had previously forecast. Instead, based on the XAU/XAG ratio returning below 90 from above 100 currently, we see silver eventually making it higher towards USD 37.

In silver, the recent and brutal slump in COMEX futures saw the high-grade price move from a 75 cents premium to spot silver prices in London on tariff speculation to a 60 cents discount as the tariff threat was removed, together with recession angst explaining why silver suffered such a relatively big correction. With the spread now trading close to neutral, silver is once again able to respond to outside market movements, especially those in gold and copper, both of which are trading higher on safe haven and China stimulus speculation.

Copper traders bet on China stimulus

Copper prices surged following Trump's announcement of a 90-day tariff pause, but significant uncertainty remains over the long-term impact of tariffs on demand for pro-cyclical commodities like copper and other industrial metals. Prior to the rebound, the downturn was fueled by escalating trade tensions, with US duties on Chinese goods rising to 145% and Beijing retaliating by capping its tariff at 125% hike, calling Trump levies a “Joke”. These aggressive measures threaten not only US–China trade relations but also increase domestic inflationary pressures in the US while damaging China's export-driven economy, which is already grappling with weak domestic demand.

Fears that US tariffs could extend to copper imports drove a sharp rise in New York futures last month, with prices at one point commanding a 15% premium over London. However, as the tariff war deepened and global recession fears mounted, copper prices reversed course—HG copper futures plunged 21%, partially due to a halving of that transatlantic premium.

After once again finding support near USD 4 per pound, HG copper has since rebounded, with market focus shifting toward potential stimulus from China to counterbalance weaker exports. Given the unsustainable nature of a +100% tariff for both US consumers and Chinese producers, we believe a de-escalation in trade tensions remains the most likely outcome—one that could ease recession fears and trigger a further relief rally.

That said, expectations of a near-term supply deficit have been scaled back. While global demand may not reach earlier forecasts, the structural demand linked to the energy transition—particularly for copper's role as a key conductor—remains intact and unlikely to face a major slowdown.

Crude prices tumble towards supply destruction territory

A combination of factors continues to weigh heavily on oil prices, notably the ongoing global trade war, which is likely to curtail economic growth and dampened energy demand, alongside OPEC’s surprise decision to accelerate production from next month. This shift reflects a broader market realization: prices must find a lower equilibrium where high-cost producers are compelled to reduce output, thereby mitigating the dual challenge of slowing demand growth and rising supply from key OPEC+ members.

Following the Liberation Day announcement of reciprocal tariffs, Brent and WTI crude futures both experienced a sharp $12 selloff, briefly plunging to four-year lows—levels last seen during the peak of the pandemic, when the global economy entered a synchronized slowdown. Although the implementation of some tariffs, excluding those on China, was delayed by 90 days, the market damage had already been inflicted, leaving prices struggling to regain stability.

Further amplifying the downward pressure has been significant selling from macro-focused funds using crude oil as a hedge against recession risks. This strategy is traditionally centered on the bond market, but with rising yields rendering bonds ineffective as a hedge in this cycle, some funds have shifted their focus to commodities like oil.

The latest price slump was intensified by OPEC+’s unexpected move to fast-track production increases beginning in May. The official rationale was to penalize quota violators—namely Kazakhstan, Russia, and the UAE. However, this strategy likely reflects a broader objective by core producers, especially Saudi Arabia, to reclaim market share lost in recent years to non-OPEC+ competitors. Previous production cuts had propped up prices, enabling high-cost producers, particularly in the U.S., to expand output.

WTI crude’s drop to $60 per barrel has pushed it below the break-even threshold for many U.S. shale operators, including those in the Permian Basin—the most productive oilfield in the world and the heart of the American energy industry. While many U.S. producers have hedged portions of their output through futures contracts, a sustained period of suppressed prices could lead to widespread production cutbacks, albeit nowhere near the scale of the reductions seen in 2020 but still enough to help balance the market.

A large share of US gas production is tied to oil activity, especially in shale formations, where oil companies often extract so-called associated natural gas alongside. Crude oil generally has a higher market value than natural gas, so if oil prices fall, drilling activity will likely slow, which in turn reduces both oil and associated gas production.

In tandem with reduced output from high-cost producers, another key source of potential price support lies in the geopolitical arena. Sanctions and tariffs targeting countries like Venezuela, Iran, and Russia threaten to erode their production capacity in the coming months. This disruption presents a strategic opening for GCC producers—particularly Saudi Arabia—to boost output and strengthen their foothold both within OPEC and the broader global market.

Further reading : click here

Ole Hansen
Ole Hansen

Media contact

Wim Heirbaut

Senior PR Consultant, Befirm

Share

Get updates in your mailbox

By clicking "Subscribe" I confirm I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy.

About Saxo Bank

About Saxo

At Saxo we believe that when you invest, you unlock a new curiosity for the world around you. As a provider of multi-asset trading and investment solutions, Saxo’s purpose is to Get Curious People Invested in the World. We are committed to enabling our clients to make more of their money. Saxo was founded in Copenhagen, Denmark in 1992 with a clear vision: to make the global financial markets accessible for more people. In 1998, Saxo launched one of the first online trading platforms in Europe, providing professional-grade tools and easy access to global financial markets for anyone who wanted to invest.

Today, Saxo is an international award-winning investment firm for investors and traders who are serious about making more of their money. As a well-capitalised and profitable fintech, Saxo is a fully licensed bank under the supervision of the Danish FSA, holding broker and banking licenses in multiple jurisdictions. As one of the earliest fintechs in the world, Saxo continues to invest heavily into our technology. Saxo’s clients and partners enjoy broad access to global capital markets across asset classes on our industry-leading platforms. Our open banking technology also powers more than 150 financial institutions as partners by boosting the investment experience they can offer their clients (B2B2C). Keeping our headquarters in Copenhagen, Saxo has more than 2,300 professionals in financial centres around the world including London, Singapore, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Zurich, Dubai and Tokyo.

For more information, please visit: www.home.saxo

 

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:

Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)